A WEEK IN MY GARDEN - 7 JUNE, THE ROSES CONTINUE
Last week I threatened to write about every rose in the garden, and provide a short summary of my thoughts on each one. Today I carry out that threat in part two of my rose round up where a further seven roses will be reviewed.
You’ll notice that I haven’t commented on the scent of any of these roses. That’s because most of them smell lightly rosey but not distinctively different If a rose has no scent or if it’s particularly delicious then I will point it out.
First up is 'Queen of Sweden' bred by David Austin. It's in the foreground of the photo below, and has warm pink buds which open to very pretty cupped flowers in a pale pink. I have planted it in a group of three. This rose has an unusual habit. Its growth is very upright and the flowers appear on the tops of the plant and face upwards. It's not that tall (1m) but I have planted it in the middle of the border because the blooms are only at the top of the shrub.
It's a good healthy rose with no signs of black spot. The flowers don't seem to last that long for me, the petals seem to shatter and fall rather than fade. It does repeat flower though.
![]() |
Queen of Sweden |
Next to Queen of Sweden is another David Austin rose 'Munstead Wood'. It does get a bit of rust, and I think for this reason it has now been delisted, leaving David Austin without a very dark red rose in their list.
![]() |
Rosa 'Munstead Wood' |
![]() |
Rosa 'Champagne Moment' |
The next rose was a garden centre impulse buy. I was struck by the colour which is a deep rich pink. It is called 'Othello' and turned out to be another of those David Austin roses which they no longer sell, but which are available from other rose growers.
It's been in a couple of years and it doesn't have a lot of room to expand, which I need to rectify with some culling of geraniums. I'm reserving judgement on this one until it's been in a while longer, The flowers are stunning in my humble opinion, but there are not many of them. It seems to be healthy though and probably just needs a year or two to really get going.
![]() |
Rosa 'Othello' |
Below is 'Winchester Cathedral', and yes it's another David Austin rose. Its white, but has the occasional touch of pink in it as it is a sport (naturally occurring variant) of a pink rose called Mary Rose. This was the very first rose I bought for the garden when we moved in about 15 years ago. I had been persuaded to take part in the village open gardens, since the previous owners had done so, but there was little for visitors to see, so I bought this one and put it in a garden urn. Now planted in the border, it is still doing well.
Unlike the cup shaped blooms of many David Austin roses in this rose the petals are more muddled. They are closer to many of the old roses in their shape. Its reasonably healthy rose about 1m in height and repeat flowers after its first early flush. Having said all that if I had to choose between this and Rosa ‘Iceberg’, I’d choose the latter.
![]() |
Rosa 'Winchester Cathedral' |
![]() |
Rosa 'Gertrude Jekyll' |
From Rosa 'Gertrude Jekyll' to a rose grown by Gertrude Jekyll. This is Rosa spinosissima 'Double White'. It was in the garden when we arrived and it spreads. It has fine ferny leaves and sweet little flowers and flowers once. It grows in shade and is completely healthy. If you have a space that suits it then give it a go.
So we come to the end of this post. Thank you for reading and I hope to see you next time.
Goodness, 'Munstead Wood' is extraordinarily beautiful. It is one we don't grow but will surely have to find somewhere. One which had been a great success here this year, a recent purchase, is 'Eustacia Vye'. Few roses are so prolific to flower, I feel, and they keep good condition for ages and ages.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the recommendation it does sound rather lovely. I'll have to see if I can find a space for one.
Delete